Whedon.info
Charisma Carpenter
Charisma Carpenter - Nude on Playboy Magazine Photoshoot - Good Quality Photos 2
Wednesday 2 November 2005, by Webmaster
110
Forum messages
-
27 April 2004 18:30, by Anonymous
WOW! That’s all I have to say...WOW!
-
27 April 2004 18:50, by WaQ
WOW
this is what we’ve been waiting for.
good job guys
-
27 April 2004 18:50, by Capt’n Crunch
she has big giant dark nipples?! Oh No! She’s just alright now.
-
27 April 2004 19:08, by Martin
Well, the first picture’s more than a little tacky, but the rest are all quite tasteful and attractive IMO :)
-
27 April 2004 22:20, by Kirby
One word....WOW. This girl is hot with one hell of a capital H. Can i get a wolf whistle? lol. wonder how much playboy paid her to do them....not enough imo :)
-
27 April 2004 23:47, by A . K
Oh!!!!!!My God!!!!!!Charisma you know what,you are a true beauty,really you are a body so sexy.I Hope your friend is happy.
-
28 April 2004 02:58, by eek-a-nipple
beware of the mighty leather nipples!!!!
-
28 April 2004 05:07, by DarkAvenger
She is a damn Goddess!! Such Big beautiful breasts makes you wanna just jump on her. Its a real shame they didnt show more though. Her boobs are great but is it just me or do they look smaller without her clothes?
-
28 April 2004 06:42, by Anonymous
Yuck, those nipples are awful!
-
28 April 2004 09:27, by Anonymous
very nice ass
-
28 April 2004 09:51, by Me
Wow..just,..wow!
And to those dissing her nips?..wha tha fuh?..her nipples are perfect...nice sized, dark areolas thick long nipples..mmmmm..nice!
Togh I wis they’d put more pics..probably have ome on their site..make us pay xtra for ’em :(
Not that I wouldn’t...:) just don’t have a creditcard to use..wonder if they’l take a M.O.?...
Anyways...Charisma Carpenter is true a goddess!!!
-
28 April 2004 10:16, by doom.
*twitch* creepy nipples
-
28 April 2004 10:20, by Anonymous
WOW! Does anyone know where people in the UK can purchase this magazine?
-
28 April 2004 10:45, by Greed
mmmmmm still as gorgeous as ever. And for those dissing her nips, she’s just had a kid for gods sake!!! Considering that i think she looks fantastic, well done girl :)
-
28 April 2004 11:04, by Anonymous
These images are fakes. The june edition of Playboy hasn’t even been printed yet (and I doubt the cover has been finished either). For a start, she had shorter hair when she did the shoot. Just look at the poor composite on the cover scan (the face isn’t even on right unless she has a relly odd shaped head and very uneven hair), and charisma_carpenter_playboy_2.jpg has a double fringe at the top. They are very good fakes for the most part but the real images are yet to come - looking forward to them.
-
28 April 2004 11:27, by TMK
I can’t believe the downright hurtful things some people are saying about Charisma’s body. She’s gorgeous, and so are her nipples. Charisma’s always struck me as a private person and to pose like this took a lot of guts.
The pictures are fantastic and are right up there with anything Playboy’s ever done. It looks like they mostly put down the airbrush for once - this is what a real woman looks like!
You go girl! Ignore the haters.
-
28 April 2004 15:34, by Anonymous
"These images are fakes. The june edition of Playboy hasn’t even been printed yet (and I doubt the cover has been finished either)."
Actually, you’re wrong. The "June" issue comes out right at the beginning of May, as is the case with every month. This issue is going to be hitting the shelves in just a couple days.
And, they’re gorgeous.
-
28 April 2004 16:50, by Anonymous
I fully support an actress who wants to do Playboy, hell im all for it most of the time, but in this case...these pictures are just...they don’t really do anything for me. I guess I was expecting better pictures. Killer bod btw, beautiful as ever. The pictures are just...I can’t explain it.
-
28 April 2004 16:59, by Anonymous
She looks absolutely fantastic! She looks like what she is - a damn sexy woman with a woman’s body, gorgeous nipples and all. Well done CC!
-
28 April 2004 19:37, by someguy
to reply to TMK, could u be any more of a fool?? "charisma’s always struck me as a private person and to pose like this took a lot of guts."....and u know this cos u and charisma chat everyday on the phone yeh?.. "The pictures are fantastic and are right up there with anything Playboy’s ever done" so u admit u collect alot of playboys yes? for some1 who hasnt even seen a single girl naked apart from the ones on ur playboys, u seem to know alot...heres what u do....go out, get some sun, a life, and also a real girlfriend.
-
28 April 2004 20:48, by Anonymous
ok she is gorgeous, but i dont care what anyone says, the nipples r gross. shes got a hot body though
-
28 April 2004 21:15, by bryan
OK, REAL OR NOT- SHE’S HOT, BUT ONE WAY TO TELL IF THIS IS LEGIT FROM PBOY, IS , WHERES THE THE SECRET PLAYBOY ICON, HIDDEN ON THE COVER?
EVERY ISSUE OF PLAYBOY HAS A SECRET BUNNY ICON ON THE COVER, AN MOST OF THE TIME IT DOSENT STICK OUT, YOU GOTTA FIND IT!
AN W/ THIS ONE , I COULDNT FIND IT,,
BUT SHE’S STILL HOT, AN YES THE JUNE ISS, WILL DROP AROUND THE 1ST OF MAY!
-
28 April 2004 21:39, by SideShowGod
If they’re not fakes, why is it that on one photo, it shows a tattoo while on other’s it doesn’t - if it’s ’airbrushed’ out, why not remove it from all photos, otherwise it just shows that they’ve been airbrushed.
-
28 April 2004 21:50, by Wicked Prayer
Im 50/50 on if the pics are real or fake. In some pictures the tattoo on her lower back is visible bit in others the tattoo is not visible even though from that angle it should be. Never the less she looks smokin and they are great pics!
-
28 April 2004 22:23, by Anonymous
Plus, those picture are so not fakes as she has the same tatooe of the sun abouve her bum, the same one that can be seen in the FHM photos she’s done.
Anywho, she’s has such an amazing, incrdiably HOT body and I support her in everything she does.
-
28 April 2004 23:02, by rls
What happened to the beautiful tatoo Charisma had on her back?
Did she get it removed or was it airbrused off?
-
28 April 2004 23:53, by jeo
the bunny icon is in her hair on the bottom right
-
29 April 2004 00:33, by sansaman
It’s true about a lot of men. We tend to find too many faults in women. CC is great looking. Who cares how her nips look? Find me one woman who is perfect in every way. Thought so.
-
29 April 2004 00:56, by Anonymous
WHERES THE THE SECRET PLAYBOY ICON, HIDDEN ON THE COVER?
The bunny is in her hair by the "D" in Derek Jeter’s name.
-
29 April 2004 02:24, by Anonymous
her site confirmed that its real
-
29 April 2004 04:02, by Anonymous
Her nipples look that way because she was nursing her baby. I know that may be a buzz-kill for some of you, but there it is.....
Doesn’t kill my buzz in the least. ;)
-
29 April 2004 04:06, by ScrewedUp
I can’t see the bunny head, which tells me it is fake. However, in the bottom left corner, the writing would suggest that this is a European issue. I will find out next week for sure when my latest issue arrives in the mail.
-
29 April 2004 14:09, by TMK
In reply to someguy - I probably am a fool for arguing on a web board, but here goes:
I own a grand total of two issues of Playboy, both of which were bought for me by my girlfriend, who is now my wife. They’re in a box somewhere.
Of course I don’t chat with Charisma but if you’d read or seen any interviews with her you’d know she doesn’t generally go into detail about her private life.
I stand by what I said, these are fantastic photos of a gorgeous woman, and anyone who isolates one part of her body to criticise out of all proportion is mean-spirited and without class.
You seem to have a lot of anger directed at people you don’t know, maybe you feel life has shortchanged you somehow? Good luck with that, anyway.
-
29 April 2004 17:44, by m
She looks great especially the nipples.
-
29 April 2004 19:52, by Anonymous
"April 28th, 2004, by someguy
to reply to TMK, could u be any more of a fool?? "charisma’s always struck me as a private person and to pose like this took a lot of guts."....and u know this cos u and charisma chat everyday on the phone yeh?.. "The pictures are fantastic and are right up there with anything Playboy’s ever done" so u admit u collect alot of playboys yes? for some1 who hasnt even seen a single girl naked apart from the ones on ur playboys, u seem to know alot...heres what u do....go out, get some sun, a life, and also a real girlfriend. "
I’m not her biggest fan but if you read or see any interviews with her the fact she’s private is common sense. And don’t troll forums for the sake of it, it’s childish.
-
30 April 2004 01:07, by Anonymous
I cannot dispute that CC is a beautiful girl, obviously she is. But her nipples really do look like something out of National Geographic.
-
30 April 2004 04:36, by Paulo
I would said it’s more artistic that pornographic.
Anayhow too much disturbing to be on anay work place except in a garage.
See online : Not so impress
-
30 April 2004 08:17, by Anonymous
From the majority of these posts that comment on the weird aspect of CC’s nipples all I can conclude is that you haven’t seen the amount of variety there is with regards to the size, shape, colour and length of women’s nipples. Your inexperience is showing.
-
30 April 2004 19:38, by Anonymous
There are obviously a FAKE. The photos aren’t even OUT YET. You can tell they are Photoshopped to hell..also, Playboy photos are always great looking, these are boring. I’m quite sure Charisma’s nipples actually look much better than those, and I’m pretty sure her breasts are bigger than in those photos. Also, her tattoo is visable in some pics, but not in others... What does that tell you, people?
-
1 May 2004 17:54, by Anonymous
The sun tattoo is not visible in a couple of pics because of the glare off the swimming pool. The pics are real; Playboy already has been delivered to subscribers.
Oh, and Charisma = Hottest.Woman.EVER. Perfect all over.
-
1 May 2004 20:27, by James
Oh yeah, just what you want your kid to see in eighteen years. Put your clothes back on. As for her breasts we saw plenty of them on Angel. They were always hanging out.
-
1 May 2004 21:26, by hyoga
at least she is naked...
now i ll wait for sarah michelle
-
2 May 2004 02:07, by Ricky
I don’t know why she thought these would help her career. We’ve seen it all before. As for Sarah Michelle, you might as well forget it. Playboy has asked her twice and she’s turned them down.
-
2 May 2004 22:44, by Anonymous
OMG, THIS IS THE FAKEST SET OF PHOTOS IVE SEEN, PLUS TACKY, AND SHE ISNT TACKY,
-
3 May 2004 04:05, by buffy 4 eva
u people are all freaks u shouldnt talk about her like that!
-
4 May 2004 16:07, by Anonymous
Charisma looks beautiful,I can not believe the freaks that are fixating on her nipples. Breasts come in all shapes and sizes, not that homogenized (sp)crap that media has force fed you. The photos are quite tasteful. As for SMG, it is the individual’s choice whether or not to pose. Besides to be honest SMG looks like a bag of bones in her clothes, I am not trying to see her out of them.
-
i would have liked those photos if i didn’t know her but since i do and i hate cordillea’s charcter real bad i really can’t find her sexy.
-
4 May 2004 19:48, by CSCTheLegend
There are 100% fake. I work for the agency that deals with Charisma and she told me the when i met her a week ago and she told me that they were very tasteful and nothin was on show. She said it was all only hinted at if you know what I mean. And yes she is just as gorgeous in person
-
5 May 2004 00:58, by JeterFan
You mentioned Derek Jeter is also in this issue — June, right? What does he say in his interview?
-
5 May 2004 04:07, by DavidBoreanaz
The fakest pics I’ve ever seen!! I can’t believe you people actually consider them as real! If you want to be called "her fans" you should be able to recognise her body better! And even if there were God!How do you people are talking like this about your -supposely- favourite actress?????A little respect wouldn’t hurt anyone....
-
5 May 2004 04:13, by Rachelle
There is nothing wrong with her nipples! Women of dark pigmentation tend to have dark areola. Not all women have pink ones. And they do tend to look different in youth, then say after months of nursing!!!
Baby girl looks good. Any y’all know it! On her tattoos, for most pics they airbrushed them.
-
5 May 2004 22:47, by Dave
I hate to tell anyone crying fake, those photos are real, and they aren’t airbrushed (Playboy doesn’t airbrush). In every photo a tatoo should be visible, it is, i.e., the crucifix around her wrist is right where it should be, and except for the case where the glare is present, so is the tat on the small of her back. Charisma had said in interviews that they would just have her breasts and butt exposed, and the fact that nothing more is revealed than that also confirms for me that these are legit.
As for how I feel about it — I’m a little surprised considering how adamant she’s always been about being a good Christian girl (the church frowns on such behavior). But at least if she’s going to show it off, she did it while she still has the body and the fanbase to make it worthwhile.
-
6 May 2004 03:37, by nasty
those photo’s are fake. Check the reflection on that window in the PB3pic, they had me for a minute.
-
6 May 2004 03:40, by Anonymous
Well, I am buying this issue. She looks great, period.
-
6 May 2004 07:39, by graphic artist
you can tell by the stupid Playboy article subjects/titles on the homemade Playboy cover (bad sarcasm, Playboy doesn’t put sarcasm on it’s covers, only in it’s articles - lol)....these photos are apprently fake (well, at least the cover def is). Can’t wait for the real ones tho!! wooo-hooo!
-
6 May 2004 10:42, by Anonymous
All photographs are fake, 3 are from an FHM photo shoot 2 years ago and the with the reflection is an old modelling photo in which Charisma is actually wearing a Bikini.
All the pictures are real Charisma pictures mixed together, the only part that isn’t real is her nipples.
-
6 May 2004 17:42, by Phizzy
Lol, her tats are all different sizes XD
-
6 May 2004 18:21, by The Truth
These pictures are real. She is hot. I do not fault her for showing off her great body. More women need to follow her example.
-
7 May 2004 05:56, by Seph
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/040506/ids_photos_en/r3997254293.jpg&e=13&ncid=1756
that is a link to a real picture of the Charisma Playboy cover....and it’s the same as the one on Digitalstar...so my guess is that they are real..... /:)
-
7 May 2004 07:09, by atlantis
I can’t speak for the photos, but the cover is real. Check out playboy.com for yourself.
-
7 May 2004 07:22, by Anonymous
These pics are real. They just showed them on Late Show.
-
7 May 2004 09:23, by Anonymous
Did that guy really say Playboy doesn’t airbrush? You gotta be f*cking kidding me!
-
7 May 2004 10:26, by Anonymous
I want Willow!!!!
-
7 May 2004 11:48, by ShaiAlytNeroon
To all the people saying negative things about her nipples... you’re really only exposing your own lack of sexual experience. The human body has a wide range of colours, shapes and characteristics and the world is all the better for it.
For anyone who wants to whack off to Pamela Anderson’s umpteenth pictorial the May issue is available from Playboy’s web site.
Charisma’s pictorial is amazing and she looks great. So, um, neener! ;)
-
9 May 2004 03:17, by gypsychild
let’s face facts many of these celebrities pose nude because they’re broke or are trying to get more roles even nikki cox said it’s all because she "fits the clothes" charisma carpenter isn’t a great actress by stretch of the imagination she looks good and posing for playboy could go both ways good or bad and these pictures do look good though i won’t front about that she’s tight but i think it was all about the money in hollywood a million actresses go oh no i’ll never pose for playboy or do nudity hint neve campbell will be doing nudity in an up coming flick and wasn’t charisma screaming some years ago she wouldn’t do this in the end they all give in to the money i would’nt be too suprised if sarah michelle geller did a pictorial next when her career starts to tank but still the pictures are hot but i doubt if i’ll buy it
-
9 May 2004 08:22, by shady000
well if they r fake which i doubt y couldnt they make these photos ages ago before playboy was thought of.
-
10 May 2004 04:44, by ROB
I have new found respect for Charisma’s breast after all those bad jokes about her breast over the years. No denying, they are very very nice.
-
10 May 2004 04:45, by Anonymous
If anyone thinks these are fake just look at http://playboy.com/magazine/ and you’ll see the cover. I’ve seen the magazine myself.
-
11 May 2004 13:34, by Anonymous
For those of you scream "fake". (Especially those of you saying the cover is fake.) You need to check out the official playboy site!
-
12 May 2004 23:03, by Anonymous
I’m just curious as to what people think is wrong with her nipples? They looked fine to me. Hell they look like most women’s that I’ve seen.
-
14 May 2004 12:32, by MiguelCar
"kids" the photos are real and theres nothing wrong with her breats
-
14 May 2004 13:03, by stakeit
Anyone that’s breast fed a baby will tell u whats wrong with them nipples, ERRRRR NOTHING they normal!
-
14 May 2004 20:48, by Anonymous
For everyone STILL not thinkin these are real, my brother in law has the magazine, AND Charisma herself was on Conan O’Brian a week or two ago, and she talked about the pictures.
-
15 May 2004 01:24, by LaForge
For those of you who still don’t belive... you will one day when your old enough to buy Playboy ;)
-
17 May 2004 21:15, by Tommy
How ignorant. For those of you who rarely see real naked women. Most of the people on this planet are people of color and have dark nipples. Only white people have white nipples, and of course are the majority of nude women on the internet, but in real life most women have dark nipples.
-
17 May 2004 21:40, by ariana
hey come on seriously she is gorgeous woman, who cares about her nipples, breasts tatoos whatever, she is beautiful woman with a beautiful body.
-
19 May 2004 04:10, by kevin
people should quite worrying about if something is fake or not, and other such issues. we should be greatful for someone like Charisma that is willing to portray femininity in a positive way. we have far too many negative portrayals. everything was done with utmost class as i can see. she is a true role model.
-
19 May 2004 18:09, by Anonymous
YEPP
DEM SOME UGLY NIPS
-
19 May 2004 21:18, by kevin
there is nothing wrong with her nipples, charisma is a beautiful woman and i don’t know why people keep saying that her nipples are gross, when ur old enough to actually see nipples and know what they look like then mention something about it, otherwise stop complaining.
-
20 May 2004 00:45, by Dan
She’s beautiful
-
20 May 2004 14:13, by JaY
i dont think any 1 here can say theres anything wrong with cc shes gorgeous and ill bet shes alot better looking then any of you (and me) maybe its the 1st nipples any of u have seen and they’re wierd lumpy things like urs
-
20 May 2004 20:24, by angeleyes
For all the people who seems to worry about Charisma’s nippels, here’s the answer. Most of the woman that where pregnant does get very dark nippels and this can stay like that for over a year. So don’t worry about if they are real or not. She realy looks great, asspecially for someone who just had a baby!!!!!
So Charisma, REALY GREAT PICTURES!!!!!
-
22 May 2004 04:44, by Anonymous
It’s amazing how anyone could criticize these photos. Yes, I’m sure they are airbrushed, but I’m not suggesting it’s been done to a large degree, it’s just what Playboy does. CC looks amazing, having just had a baby or not. The idea that any man or woman would criticize her body is ridiculous. Kuddos to her for having the guts and still having a body that great past the age of 19!
-
I’ve seen the magazine myself, and I can assure you, the pictures are real. The word choice in the article really sounds like hers (from the times I’ve seen her on talk shows).
-
28 May 2004 20:24, by Anonymous
These are the real pics, and her nippples are nasty. I breastfed 2 babies and mine don’t look like that. I wish I saw the Conan show she was on cause I really want to know what she was thinking posing in the first place being a mom and all. I think shes a skank.
-
29 May 2004 02:38, by Anonymous
I just wish that I looked as good as CC! Aren’t you people being a little nit-picky complaining about her nipples? Like you’d turn her down if she asked you out on a date...whatever...Grow up!!!!
-
30 May 2004 09:38, by TheSHOW
All i can say is that i have wanted to see this since she first appeared on Buffy
-
31 May 2004 22:17, by joe blow
Her nipples are HOT. no two ways about it. You guys who think they’re wierd or ugly are IDIOTS.
-
4 June 2004 12:35, by bigrob
Never seems to fail when a tv star, movie star strives to show us what we want there are pricks who have to down her for it. I mean crap so what if her nipples dont look like farraf fawcetts if you want to see farrahs buy the next pb with her in it. Till then enjoy these pics cause to me they are sweet.
-
9 June 2004 14:23, by admirer
I can’t understand why any of you are complaining. She looks fantastic, has a great body and wonderful nipples. And anyway, when you are running your tongue over them and feeling them harden between your lips does it really matter how dark they are?
-
15 June 2004 17:18, by Anonymous
well i am gonna be the odd man out on this. when i first heard she was posing (about 6 months ago) my first reaction was, why now? why after a kid. why not do it before you get pregnant? i still think she is very pretty and love her face and eyes. i wish i didnt see her boobs. i always imagined how perfect they were. and now i have reality. old implants and brown frying pan sized nipples. for an average women these pics would be great but for charisma, i was disappointed.
-
19 June 2004 00:05, by Samantha Z
GET OVER THE NIPPLES, ITS PERFECTLY NORMAL FOR DARKER SKINNED WOMEN TO HAVE AREOLA THAT COLOUR. SHEESH. SHES GORGUZ AND IF ANY OF U GUYS HAD THE CHANCE TO SLEEP WITH HER U WOULD JUMP AT THE INVITATION.
BUILD A BRIDGE AND GET OVER IT.
-
19 June 2004 13:43, by HellYeh
I think she’s one of the most attractive women to have graced our television screens in many years. With clothes on, she’s amazing and with them off, she’s absolutely stunning. And to look that good after having a baby... damn! Not to mention I think she’s an excellent actress. I’m sure you people hung up on the nipple issue (they look great, by the way) are either jealous girls or immature boys. :)
-
21 June 2004 21:16, by Anonymous
It amazes me how hung up people are over her nipples, because if you’d look at the actual Playboy issue, and look at the pictures (particularly the one where she’s sitting down with her arms over her head arching her back) you’d see that most of the pictures circulating online have been altered color wise, and that in the actual issue itself, her nipples look light brownish in most pictures. So everyone complaining that she has disgustingly dark nipples should just go buy the issue if they’d like to see what her nipples really look like. I too thought they were too dark and oddly colored when I saw the pictures online, but after I bought the issue, I realized how the color was fucked with. You can tell there’s a HUGE difference. It’ll definitely change your opinion of her breasts.
-
26 July 2004 01:53, by BABU
I can die happy now.CC IS probably the only celebrity that would cause me to renew my subscription to AIRBRUSHED MANNEQUINS ON PARADE but I won’t.Just very impressed to see her willing to pose and with a minimum of retouching.
-
29 August 2004 07:11, by Anthony
Am I the only one who finds it largely amusing to scroll down to the people’s posts about how these are "the fakest pictures ever"? For instance:
"May 5th, 2004, by DavidBoreanaz
The fakest pics I’ve ever seen!! I can’t believe you people actually consider them as real! If you want to be called "her fans" you should be able to recognise her body better! And even if there were God!How do you people are talking like this about your -supposely- favourite actress?????A little respect wouldn’t hurt anyone...."
I guess we know her body a bit better than you, then.
-
30 August 2004 21:13, by Anonymous
I can’t believe this conversation is still a debate. Go to any of her sites, and look at the malibu shores caps. She was FLAT CHESTED!!!! She got her breast implants at the end of the 2nd season. She came back with shorter hair and bigger boobs. Sarah came back blonder. I don’t care about her breast size. She is a wonderful actress and pretty. At least with her fake boobs she will fit in over at Charmed!!!
-
29 November 2004 01:53, by Anonymous
she is so hot.
there is nothing wrong with her nipples and for some reason, to me, her breasts look bigger with her clothes on
-
9 March 2005 17:12, by Anonymous
She is flawless, flawless in every way!!!
-
2 April 2005 17:16, by aaaa
a’’a
tytttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
See online : you are the best
-
18 June 2005 02:50, by Anonymous
DAMNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!! She has the total package! It is unbelievable that she has pushed a baby out of that tight body. She needs to get another show, preferably wearing something extremely tight and or revealing. And for those who don’t like her nipples, stop smoking crack.
-
4 April 2006 09:58, by Chris
She’s just a godess. Thanx Playboy for that pictorial. No comment about her body, she’s perfect!
-
25 July 2006 04:57, by btvs+Angel worshipper (& mourner)
Re: "she did NOT have a boobjob"
oh come on, in one pic w/her on her back u can easily see (surprisingly easily) the lousy job of airbrushing-out the scars under her breast (apparently not the more modern, usual nip-entry surgery; again surprising, but obvious)...
Re: "her boobs look bigger in clothes"
oh come on (again, lol), have u never heard of BRAS? Sheesh... wonderbra, lift-bra, water bra, etc... they’re ALWAYS made to look bigger/better in clothes... but you are right, in this shoot her "droopage" is showing... she shoulda done the shoot a few (many) years ago, before starting to decline a bit... (or waited until a "lift" was done).
— -doesn’t matter, she’s beautiful no matter what (well, ok, not so much when she gained weight towards the end of Angel, especially in the face... ick)
>;]
-
31 July 2006 01:24, by Temujin
Whether or not she had her tits done, she’s got them is how I see it.
-
5 August 2006 14:50, by Anonymous
Playboy have done an awful job and to me they look as fake as the actual fakes on the net. Charisma has looked hotter while sometimes wearing barely anything in Angel than here.
-
2 October 2006 02:52, by very appreciative
And unlike Britney, at least Charisma has let us see her bare nipples - no messing about - no teasing. A lot of guys will be jerking off to these, if they are honest !
-
2 October 2006 07:31, by normal guy
Her nipples are very special and we should be pleased she has shown them to us. Enjoy !
-
17 October 2006 16:11, by one who has a life
hahaha i have to laugh at you guys !!! youv never had one tiny bit of sex have you!!
no really you need to grow up and get a life
sad,sad, oh so very sad
-
28 October 2007 15:05, by btvs + angel worshipper
—to "one who has a life"
...
lol, who’s more pathetic, those of us who HAVE had so much sex we want/appreciate a little extra thrill, such as a hot actress finally showing her boobs (whether fake or not, still very nice), — us —,
or
you, a typical lame-a** TROLL, wasting your time TROLLing around the net with NOTHING to contribute except "ha-ha!"... weak.
>;]
— ps: -still waiting for the Buffster to finally acknowledge her legion of rabid/devoted fans with a little nip flash or sumthin, tho she seems far too uptight/stuckup (some would say "classy", etc, but that’s just L.A.M.E) to do so... sigh... the "real" people never live up to the expectations...
-
Guys obviously none of you have had a wife that gave birth recently, they darken considerably. They generally go back to "normal" but it can take a while. I think they look great and when taken in tandem with the fact she has had a kid and still looks that good I can’t argue. If she were to come up to me and say "I need to have sex with you right now" I can’t see myself saying "Charisma, seriously would love to but your nipples are a bit dark and possibly a little puffy" YEah right.
|
|