Homepage > Joss Whedon Cast > David Boreanaz > Reviews > David Boreanaz - "Bones" Tv Series - Season 1 DVD - Movieweb.com (...)
« Previous : Sing Along with Buffy
     Next : Sarah Michelle Gellar & Freddie Prinze Jr - "Moulin Rouge" Movie Premiere - High Quality Photos 1 »

Movieweb.com

David Boreanaz

David Boreanaz - "Bones" Tv Series - Season 1 DVD - Movieweb.com Review

Saturday 2 December 2006, by Webmaster

Picture and sound are noteworthy but that doesn’t really help anyone here. It’s an unoriginal show with a DVD lacking any real features, it’s not worth your time. When I first saw the advertising for Bones I basically said to myself "oh man, not another crime drama". I didn’t even bother watching it on television. After I got the DVD to review it I was sad to say that my fears were true. Bones is nothing but a product of a trend, and that trend is the crime drama. The way I see it there are only 4 types of shows on primetime television: reality, crime drama, medical drama, and sitcom. There are a few shows that actually strive to be original such as LOST and Desperate Housewives, but most new shows fall into one of the trendy genres.

The plot of the show is very formulaic. David Boreanaz stars as FBI agent Steeley Booth who teams up with forensic expert Dr. Temperance Brennan. The team combine knowledge and go on a crime solving spree. So, you have an agent who solves cases by clues from the living and an anthropologist who gathers clues from the dead and the skeletal remains. Oh no, get ready for some clashing of styles! Within the first episode I knew that the show was a drag, and it really is. The acting is so stiff and wooden and the writing is incredibly poor. Commentary On Pilot Episode & "Two Bodies In The Lab":

The audio commentaries are basically just talk about how the show got made, they’re really uninteresting.

Squints:

The cast talk about how they prepared for their roles in the show.

The Real Definition:

A guide to forensic terminology.

The special features are incredibly disappointing, they are merely space fillers. I guess Fox didn’t want to put too much effort into something that ultimately will get cancelled. The Look

The show is presented in 1.78:1 anamorphic widescreen and I do have to admit it’s a beautiful presentation. The image is incredibly sharp and colors are handled perfectly. One thing about the show, despite how bad it is, is that it has some great lighting. I have to acknowledge the cinematography and the transfer definitely puts that on display. From what I can tell it’s near perfect. The Sound

The show is also presented in Dolby Digital 5.1. The show doesn’t really utilize the surround speakers that much, but it’s nice to have it. It’s a pretty standard audio mix. The Packaging

Bones comes in a plastic outer sleeve, inside there is a cardboard case that houses two slimline DVD cases. The set consists of 4 double-sided discs with 2 discs dedicated to each case. You have to appreciate the effort to keep the set as small as possible, and I always appreciate that since shelf space is always of concern. However, double-sided discs are a disappointment mostly because they usually get scratched and scuffed much easier and quicker than single sided DVD’s. Double-sided DVD’s also offer much less space for video and audio, which leaves me wondering how the picture turned out so great. On the back of the DVD set there is a quote that says that "Bones is a sexed-up CSI". That right there says it all. Bones is nothing more than a show that is trying to capitalize off the success of shows like CSI and Law & Order. Bones is a complete waste of time when there are so many other better shows on television.


5 Forum messages

  • It would be really great if the reviewer could spell the names of the characters right. Then it might show that they at least tried to be knowledgeable on the show. But their blatent disregard for the facts and announced biased just makes their review useless to anyone actually trying to base a judgement on whether or not to buy the dvd set. Poor quality
  • I may be more willing to take your advice if you could at least spell names correctly. Way to let your readers know that you probably just stuck to your preconcieved ideas about it and never even bothered to watch an episode. This isn’t another crime drama, it’s a fantastic character-driven show with the weekly case as something that should be viewed as secondary to the great chemistry this whole cast has. Something you would have picked up on if you watched the whole first season, which you should have if you’re going to have the authority to write a review of it.

    Still confused? It’s Seeley Booth. Not Steeley. Thanks for a good laugh though.

  • Well, we know the guy from Movieweb is not a fan of the show Bones. The fans don’t want to hear such horribly negative critiques about their favorite show. Why put this excerpt on this page?
  • Seriously? Desperate Housewives? If you think that is original I dont think your opinion is worth much of anything at all.
  • To use the reviewer’s words: this REVIEW is a complete waste of time! I really don’t know what is the source of the acrimony, but this "thing" is wrong and misleading and plain mean. I hope people won’t make up their minds about the series based on that.