Homepage > Joss Whedon’s Tv Series > Buffy The Vampire Slayer > Reviews > Mythology : Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s Impact
« Previous : Joss Whedon - "Powers" Comic Book - Issue 1 - Medium Quality Pages Preview
     Next : "Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog" Web Series - Official Ornaments »

Boxofficeprophets.com

Buffy The Vampire Slayer

Mythology : Buffy the Vampire Slayer’s Impact

Sunday 22 November 2009, by Webmaster

It seems a bit late to me, the recent vampire trendiness. True Blood, Twilight, The Vampire Diaries, big hits, all of them. Yet, they’re also all late to the game. Not that vampires are anything new in literature or showbiz, but the real vampire peak, at least from a creative point of view, happened before Sookie, before Bella, before whoever is in that CW show. The real peak happened when a girl not only fell in love with a vampire, but also when she began slaying them. That girl’s name is Buffy Summers, and her series is perhaps the greatest mythology show of all time. At the very least, it’s my favorite.

It didn’t start out that way. The first season and a half of Buffy seemed that it was following a similar pattern to The X-Files. It would alternate between weekly vampire and demon slayings, and an ongoing arc in which we learn more about the demon world while Buffy and her gang battle the main villain, known on the show as the Big Bad. Not that this wasn’t a good show; it just wasn’t anything really special. Then, and I’m about to drop a massive spoiler here, her vampire lover Angel turns bad, and there is no turning back.

You see, the mythology show as a genre unto itself has seen many revolutions on the road to its current incarnation. Star Trek started it all. The adventures of the Enterprise are self-contained, but the world of the show is vast, complex and fascinating. Twin Peaks came along and merged the idea of serialization with a fantasy-based universe. X Files developed the long running arc alternating with Trek-like stand-alones. When Angel lost his soul on Buffy, a new model emerged, and, despite never having huge numbers, we still see the influence in today’s shows.

Show-runner Joss Whedon developed a structure wherein each season is a self-contained story, and each story ties into each other story creating a seven intertwined story run. As I said before, each season features a Big Bad, many of whom contribute to the show’s over-arching mythos. Beyond the structural blueprint, unlike most show-runners of the time, and many still, Whedon had no problems upsetting the status quo. Characters evolve, relationships change, and consequences of a character’s action in one season remain relevant for many seasons to come.

Of course, this complex web of storytelling holds viewers to a higher standard. I don’t mean to sound snooty. What I mean is that most television at the time was episodic as opposed to serialized. There were exceptions from the past like Dallas or Melrose Place, but these shows are ongoing, without an endpoint in mind. The value of an episodic structure is that viewers can jump in and out from week to week and not feel as if they’d missed something. The Dallas/Melrose structure is a little more complicated, but they’re of the more-things-change-the-more-they-stay-the-same school. You may need a refresher on the details, but the big picture doesn’t really vary. Even The X-Files had far more monster-of-the-week material than mythology episodes.