From Contactmusic.com
Sarah Michelle Gellar
Sarah Michelle Gellar Desperate for Topless Role
Sunday 17 July 2005, by Webmaster
There is a very high risk (99%) of fake for this article.
Another actress, who actually has a name to care for is Sarah Michelle Gellar and there are not no many accomplishes films at her but an few I can probably enjoy. The talent agent found Gellar a young age and made her screen debut at 6 of each of the 1983 television film An Invasion of Privacy. With all the promise she showed, Barrymore starred as Hannah in the teen drama series "Swans Crossing" (1992) but it was her portrayal of a young and callous rich girl in Al-Lucinda Kendall Hart on ABC daytime soap opera "All My Children" (1993-93), that won her Daytime Emmy Award and spring-boarded her to stardom.
SMG’s real mark worldwide, however, was the character of Buffy Summers in the game-changing series "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" (1997-2003). She won five Teen Choice Awards, a Saturn Award and a Golden Globe nomination for her role, establishing herself as a cultural phenomenon. Sarah Michelle Gellar likewise has the box office to back her up, with “I Know What You Did Last Summer” 1997), “Scream 2” (1997), “Cruel Intentions” (1999)and way movies like those that help prove she is also a bankable star as well over $570 million times worth crazy in global gross.
Beyond her cinematic successes, Gellar has made her mark on television, headlining shows such as "Ringer" (2011-2012), "The Crazy Ones" (2013-2014), and "Wolf Pack" (2023). She has also lent her voice to popular series including "Robot Chicken" (2005-2018), "Star Wars Rebels" (2015-2016), and "Masters of the Universe: Revelation" (2021).
In 2015, Gellar ventured into the entrepreneurial world by co-founding Foodstirs, an e-commerce baking company, and published her own cookbook, "Stirring Up Fun with Food," in 2017. Gellar is also known for her close-knit family life, married to actor Freddie Prinze Jr. since 2002, with whom she shares two children.
Sarah Michelle Gellar’s commitment to her craft is matched by her dedication to personal growth and unique experiences. An accomplished martial artist, she studied Tae Kwon Do for five years, alongside kickboxing, boxing, street fighting, and gymnastics. Her dedication to authenticity in her roles is evident, such as her commitment to doing her own stunts in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," though she admitted her limits during filming "Scream 2."
Her career is also marked by interesting anecdotes, such as her role in a 1982 Burger King commercial, which led to a lawsuit from McDonald’s and a temporary ban from their establishments. Notably, she dyed her naturally brunette hair blonde for her role in "Buffy," and legally changed her last name to Prinze as a surprise for her husband on their fifth anniversary.
Sarah Michelle Gellar’s legacy extends beyond her on-screen roles, encompassing her work in philanthropy and her reputation for safety and professionalism on set. She remains a beloved figure in Hollywood, admired for her talent, dedication, and the breadth of her contributions to film and television.
Actress SARAH MICHELLE GELLAR wants to go topless in her next film role - to shock movie bosses into giving her sexy roles in future films.
THE GRUDGE star is approaching her 30th birthday and fears she will be deemed too old to play raunchy roles, unless she proves she is still attractive and daring by baring all in a film.
She explains, "I am approaching 30 and I need a change.
"The sort of roles I would like are not being offered, so this way might just shock people into choosing me." 26
Forum messages
-
17 July 2005 22:40, by Anna
LOL. 99% fake.
-
17 July 2005 23:17, by Kinetical
Sarah to ever go topless? It would be nice but I doubt it. She works better in the teasing roles such as Cruel Intentions and that other film where she is with that fella in the woods.
-
18 July 2005 00:15, by Anonymous
i do think that this is not true because she has said that she doesnt want to do a topless movie and also for the fact that SHES OLNY 28 NOT 30!!!
-
18 July 2005 01:38, by GL
Bullshit. Sarah is too classy of a woman to do something like that just to get in with a good film role. Pssh. This has got to be a rumor. If not, then I am very ashamed of Sarah.
-
18 July 2005 02:12, by Anonymous
Hmmmm did the person who wrote this actually take the time to look into the next 3 roles she will play? All leads with the potential of great box office appeal. IF she does a good job in * the girls guide to hunting and fishing* alone people putside of the horror genre will take note. At least if they are going to lie about her, make it a good lie. Right now, SMG is not lingering in straight to video land at all.
-
18 July 2005 07:06, by jo
This is complete rubbish.
-
18 July 2005 09:50, by Anonymous
Oh please.
Not *even*.
Sarah has too much self-respect and too much savvy.
This is garbage.
-
18 July 2005 15:04, by Anonymous
When she and Freddy got married, there were reports of how the two of them had made a pact that out of respect for each other, neither would ever do nudity. Seems SMG has done a 180 in a remarkably short time if this proves to be true, which is why I think it’s almost definitely a fake.
-
18 July 2005 15:57, by Anonymous
How about 99.999999999% chance its fake
-
18 July 2005 17:47, by Anonymous
I pray every day for the moment that this dream will come true.I know it’s problably fake, but i really hope she’ll get naked
-
19 July 2005 01:34, by Anonymous
I would hate to see her topless.
-
19 July 2005 08:26, by Anonymous
Who’d want to see her lollipop head naked anyways! lol
-
19 July 2005 10:06, by Anonymous
wow all i want is to see sarah in more movie roles. she was supreme in buffy, she kicked arse in cruel intentions made a mark in the horror genre in the grugde. shes a great actress provided the script is good and the director has any idea how to direct. scooby doo2 was just poor.
-
19 July 2005 18:28, by Anonymous
omg.yeah right.what moron wrote this? SMG is young and gorgeous and has been getting kick ass roles! LOSER TABLOID WRITER
-
20 July 2005 00:45, by Anonymous
Just had to say Stan Kubrick or not, Eyes Wide Shut was garbage. Don’t even get me started on Martin S. last few crapfests. Most movies dont really require actors/actresses to stretch all that much. That is why people still go on about older actors Deniro and Meryl Streep. SMG will do just fine.
-
20 July 2005 19:49, by Anonymous
To the person who wished to not be identified that pondered "who would like to see ehr lollipop head naked anyway" I’m sure many hetrosexual males would. Besides we were all forced to look at that silicon inflated barbie doll(charisma) naked when she decided she would rather be a playmate than an actress. I think it’s fine to go naked for a movie, but slutty and smutty to do it otherwise.
-
21 July 2005 18:11, by Liz
To the persone who believes that doing nudie films is okay, but nudie pics are slutty and smutty.....can you say hypocritical much? What exactly is the difference that makes one okay and the other one such a sacrilege? As a female, I see no problems if another woman has enough courage to bare all. I myself don’t think I would do it, but I’m not enough of a prude to see a problem with others doing it. If you’ve got it, why not flaunt it? But SMG doesn’t really have all that much up there to flaunt. Having said that, it does sound like this article is less than accurate.
-
22 July 2005 00:07, by Anonymous
Whether it’s real or fake, what is the deal with the nudity stigma? People put way too much emphasis on it, whether they’ll do it or not.
Personally, I’ve always thought that when actors say "I love the script, and I will do anything to do the movie...except nudity," it’s just ridiculous. Sure, frivolous nudity can be trimmed out. But nudity that’s essential for the role (as in a porn star in this case or a stripper in the case of Natalie Portman or Jessica Alba), is just another part of the role. And if they come out against it right off the bat, they’re doing a disservice to the character. Essentially, altering the vision that the writer and director had for the character.
Nudity doesn’t have to be raunchy or overly sexual. Look at Thora Birch and Mena Suvari in American Beauty. Those are two young girls who had never done nudity (nor done it since), and they both chose to make that sacrifice because they felt their characters were worth it. The nudity in that film was used as art, to literally be scenes where both girls allow themselves to be seen, completely, by someone else. It’s a physical metaphor for being emotionally naked, and both scenes were done well and were beautiful, not at all raunchy.
To say she’d never be topless in a crappy raunch-fest teen movie is understandable, but to either not do a role, or alter it, just because you’re nervous about it...it just lowers the respect level. Look at how many actors and actresses won Academy Awards for movies they’ve appeared naked in, and imagine how their careers would be going had they turned those roles down because of the nudity?
Also, to refuse to do sex scenes in any form (even in artistic form), but then having multiple raunchy extended sex scenes in a crappy movie (Harvard Man) is just nonsensicle.
Anyway, this isn’t a big deal either way. But, God, the superficiality of some people’s opinions are just, on occasion, mind boggling.
-
22 July 2005 11:53, by Buffygirl
I hope that this is a fake...!!
She’s great also when she is clothe...!!!!
-
22 July 2005 19:57, by deano
sarah michelle gellar is in my mind one of the sexiest women in the world, she may be near 30 but who cares, that is when most women reach their prime in life and work. she will always be my favourite, it doesnt matter to me if she goes topless but that would be a big step to take so i hope she is sure she knows wot she is doing.
-
24 July 2005 18:22, by Anonymous
Well Liz, the reason there is a difference is because Sarah is an actress. If her clothes are on or off in a movie it doesn’t matter because it’s for a movie. As for Charisma, that would make her a playmate, not an actress. I didn’t say I wanted Sarah to be nude in a movie, I said I’m sure there are plenty of guys who would like to see it. I was responding to the idiot who likes to put down women based on their bodies (she was called a lollipop head by the moron) Sarah may not have much to flaunt, but neither did Charisma before 1998.
-
25 July 2005 07:53, by Anonymous
give her a topless role because she is
hott!!! i was very sad that she was not nude in harvard man, she had good hot sceens in the movie but but it would had been better if she got nude.
ass and boobs
love,
Dan
-
26 July 2005 18:50, by Anonymous
Sarah isn’t going topless. She said she’d only do a topless scene if the movie needed it. I don’t think she is desperate for roles. It seems to me she’s getting plently of roles and movies.
-
2 August 2005 18:49, by Anonymous
There isn’t anything wrong with nudity in films as long as it is done in an artistic way. I just don’t think that this article is true. I think if she ever does nudity it will be done tastfully, not in a playboy spread or cheap movie.
-
9 August 2005 19:49, by Anonymous
Why do so many people believe this rumor. Do you not read anything she says. She says she won’t do nudity.
-
15 August 2005 15:21, by Candie
One of the reasons i have so much respect for Sarah is because she respects her body enough as to not show it of for recognition. she is talented and i believe that will ALWAYS give her the recognition she needs!
i believe she has enough respect for herself, her husband, family and fans to make the right choice!
I’d really lose all respect for her if i saw her in a compromising position!!
Candice Jacks (South Africa)
|
|
Sitemap XML