|
Wednesday 17 August 2005, by chinga : nice flip-flops:)Wednesday 17 August 2005, by Anonymous : Good legs........I donīt like the hair but she looks old anywayWednesday 17 August 2005, by thunderdome : Good Legs..........but she really look oldWednesday 17 August 2005, by Anonymous : I’m glad she decided to wear a wig in this movie instead of dying her hair again. And before anyone says anything, yes it is definately a wig.Wednesday 17 August 2005, by Anonymous : i think she looks really good! really pretty!! : ) can’t wait for the movie!!!Wednesday 17 August 2005, by Anna : I think the clothes are ok but it’s the wig, the overdone makeup and penciled in eyebrows that are making her look slutty and older than she normaly looks but I guess that is suitable for the role she’s playing. I also have those exact same flip flips!! Wow. PS she’s playing a USED-TO-BE porn star.Thursday 18 August 2005, by Spike : Ha. She has no boobs. Well she has them, but she lost the ones she had in Cruel Intentions. Wow. I really don’t want to see this movie. Her playing an old skanky ex-pornstar is not really my taste in a flick. And for all the people who are saying that she looks so good, she does look her age for once. She finally lost that teenage appeal she always had. Maybe now she will reach out to all of those old slutty fans of her’s. :)Thursday 18 August 2005, by Pepp : FYI the book she is reading is Songs of the Gorilla Nation: My Journey Through Autism, it’s supposed to be a really good book!Thursday 18 August 2005, by Yeesh! : Damn! She looks old! *Shudder*Thursday 18 August 2005, by guest : she looks like she has been out all night smoking and drinking. she really looks old as well but maybe that’s the way her part is supposed to be characterizedThursday 18 August 2005, by Radiation Vibe : Yes, that’s right... she looks positively ancient. Perhaps, she should just be put down, like an old knackered horse! Jeez, people, I think y’all need to give this one some more thought.Thursday 18 August 2005, by Anonymous : she is wearing a wig in this movie. It has been confirmed. And to "spike" it’s a good thing she lost her teen appeal. She is 28. She is the youngest of the Buffy actresses and they have all aged and lost their teen appeal. She isn’t Lindsay lohan for crying out loud. Thank the heaven’s above for that. And who cares how big her boobs are. That is the business of herself, her husband, and any children she nurses in the future.Friday 19 August 2005, by Anonymous : Is it just me or does that not look like her? It obviously is, but man she sure looks different.Friday 19 August 2005, by Sarah : Ok... Marching in the SMG club here so don’t get me wrong but she does look old! I hate the hair, I don’t really think she is wearing slutty clothes though... Maybe the ugly wig is making her look old cause, ya know she’s only 28 so she not old... GOD I hate that wig!Friday 19 August 2005, by Anonymous : did you see the pictures of her from the two events last night. I guess that’s proof she wears a wig for southland tales.Friday 19 August 2005, by Anonymous : I saw an event with her at the bcbg store opening and she is still brunette. I’ve told a lot of people this was a wig, and not many people believed it. I guess they were wrong. And by the way, she definately doesn’t look "old" at the event.Friday 19 August 2005, by greg : so she quit buffy to become a slut? lol j/k but still, huge drop in the whole goodness factor, but still if a movie has smg in it, its bound to be good - unless u count harvard man - that movie was S H I T E ! ! !Monday 22 August 2005, by yorkshire_chik_sarah : god so what if she looks old in these u seen the other partyu thing ones shelooks amazing in them!!! and slutty but hav u noticed nearly all her roles are?? e.g harvard man buffy (seasoon 6 mostly) cruel intentions i know what u did last summer ect she still kiks ass tho lol shes my heroine Saturday 3 September 2005, by Anonymous : Real fans of sarah will love the way she looks, ok i mean normal ppl who just appreciate sarah michelle gellar for being an actor and the person she is. then theres the minortiy of fans who have this whole peverted notion that shes meant to look stunning, flawless and completely innocent no matter what she does. well sorry to disappoint, but this is reality. shes a person. NOT YOUR GIRLFRIEND no matter how much you want to fantasize.Saturday 3 September 2005, by noo : she needs to eat something.. or it might be looking that way cuz of the make up making her face look thinner.. but still.. eat!Monday 5 September 2005, by G : Um. I think she should stay blonde. I hate her ugly dark hair. But I do agree with that Spike guy up there. She did lose alot of her features over the years. This poor girl does need a cheeseburger or two. Its starting to get very disturbing seeing all these actresses on television, who are so tiny and skinny. Normal women are not anything like that. Well unless they worked super hard to be. So any TV, movie, or Soap Opera show that is based around reality...get some more chunkier, realistic girls on your cast!!Thursday 15 September 2005, by Anonymous : You prefer a ratty wig over her actual pretty hair? You are very weird. Get over her being thin. She is most likely more petite than you are. I wouldn’t want to watch fat girls on tv. I can’t relate to that. I am more of a skinny girl. Like Sarah. Naturally.Tuesday 20 September 2005, by Anonymous : She’s a porn star in the film.... She’s meant to look slutty.Friday 23 September 2005, by Anonymous : For all of you losers saying you think she looks bad or old, I think she looks GREAT!! She is very pretty and obviously these are taken without her knowing. Have any of you had pics taken of you with your noticing, I’d bet they would be 100X worse!! Anyway, I love SMG, and you call yourself fans.Thursday 29 September 2005, by Gigi : First of all, all of you people have pissed me off in some way already. I usually don’t post on here but for once I feel as if I have to. Sarah, in my opinion, looks so lovely with her hair blonde. Yes, her wig in these photos looks junky. But when she had blonde locks on BTVS, she was so pretty. She still is pretty with dark hair aswell, but she just looks different. As for the skinny thing, Sarah has always been uber skinny. Nothing’s changed there. Her clothes in these pictures are also not slutty at all. Even if she is out of character, thats what normal women wear out during the summer. I do think she had something done to her face though. Maybe not Botox, but something like. Her facial features have changed. That could be done with makeup too, so who knows. I also would like to say that, believe it or not, not alot of women in this world are lucky enough to be as tiny and skinny as Sarah. If, you consider that being lucky. So even if you think you look like her, you most likely don’t. Plus, it is so, so, so, sooo very shallow of some of you to make fun of over weight women. Even girls who aren’t over weight, but still aren’t as skinny as Sarah, are beautiful. Take Liv Tyler as an example. Her entire figure and appearence would be downhill if she was built like Sarah. Different looks work on different women. So stop acting like children and get over it.Monday 22 January 2007, by Buffy’s Bitch : Well for all you people saying she’s had something done to her face, your nuts. shes just got some heavy eye make up on!!!! and yeah she does look a little trashy in these pics but those short revealing tops set sarah soaring in season 2 and 3 of buffy right? Why say soemthing about it now? anyways....she is still as beautiful as ever...i do like her with blonde hair more than dark but she isnt ugly with dark!!!!These comments are an anwser to this article : Sarah Michelle Gellar - "Southland Tales" Movie Set - Good Quality Photos
|
Sitemap XML