|
Saturday 26 November 2005, by Anonymous : Um, no... most Buffy fans are probably relieved that Sarah won’t sell herself out like that.Sunday 27 November 2005, by k-dude : It proves that those stupid rumors about her wanting to do a nude scene, are just that ... stupid rumors. Sarah said before she married Freddie, that she wouldn’t do nude scenes, and she still means it. As a fan, I love the fact that she’s willing to stick to her guns, even if it could cost her a role. It’s a good trait that too few Hollywood actors have, these days.Sunday 27 November 2005, by Anonymous : where does this person get the idea that Buffy fans wants to see Sarah nude? i’m glad she’s not posing nude or doing nude scenes. i feel that just degrades the actress/actor. i’m glad Sarah has more class than that.Sunday 27 November 2005, by jazmin : This might sound lame, but I am really proud of her, not showing herself NAKED like many others did and regretted.Sunday 27 November 2005, by Sarah : I’m glad Sarah didn’t do it!!!! Good for you Sarah!Sunday 27 November 2005, by Anonymous : good for sarah! she earns all respect for me. I happen to think she is the only hollywood star who will not do nude scenes, so kudos to her!! she’s the only one left with class.Sunday 27 November 2005, by Anonymous : good for sarah! she earns all respect from me. I happen to think she is the only hollywood star who will not do nude scenes, so kudos to her!! she’s the only one left with class.Monday 28 November 2005, by Steve : It or they will come eventually. she’s too high on buffy success right now. as soon as she has a few more flop movies under her belt. we’ll see them:)Saturday 3 December 2005, by k-dude : Personally, I don’t believe she’ll ever do a nude or topless scene. She’s said she will not do that many times, and is sticking to it. I believe that before we she her nude or topless on film, we’ll she resume her role as Buffy(either in a movie, or an episode of another TV series).Monday 5 December 2005, by Anonymous : ANGEL Magazine just printed that she wants to get a topless role.seriously they even quoted her!!i don’t know whether to believe this or not...but it’s in print.this story has been all over this site.and they have said that it’s 99.9%..not true.the mag says "Sarah Michelle Gellar (Buffy) wants to go topless in her next film role - to shock movie bosses into giving her sexy roles in future films.As she approaches her 30th birthday , Sarah’s worried that it may soon be too late to play raunchy roles, unless she proves she is still attractive and daring by baring all in a film." "I am approaching 30 and I need a change," she told Contact Music. "The sort of roles I would like are not being offered, so this way [I] might just shock people into choosing me." so...WTF?!!Monday 5 December 2005, by Anonymous : Gotta’ agree with Steve on this one ... after a few flops and some years, she’ll shed her top before you can say "Halle Berry"Tuesday 13 December 2005, by Anonymous : What a bunch of lamers ’i am glad she is not getting naked’ Are you gay? Monday 2 January 2006, by Anonymous : Ok, obviously people have said this, but it’s true. Sarah (and other actresses) shouldn’t have to sell their bodies to get a role. It should be about her acting, which, in this case, it seems it is. I am proud of Sarah too!These comments are an anwser to this article : Sarah Michelle Gellar Naked ? Buffy in the Buff Nixed, No Sarah Nude
|
Sitemap XML