|
Sunday 9 April 2006, by Anonymous : I keep thinking "She looks so right for this part" If it hadn’t been for JW’s casting of Buffy, this might have been a biographical documentary...? Just a recurring thought.. Sunday 9 April 2006, by Anonymous : That’s awful! I’m sure SMG would have done something other than prostitution had she not hit it big with Buffy. Christ, she was 19 when she was cast, maybe 18. She graduated high school at 16. She had plenty of time to go to college if the acting things wasn’t working out & do anything. That was just rude.Monday 10 April 2006, by The Truth Is Out There : To the anonymous poster who posted the first comment, that is a stupid and ignorant remark to make. You might want to consider growing up.Monday 10 April 2006, by K-dude : Some people just shouldn’t voice their thoughts out loud. Sarah’s good and convincing actress. And She won the role of Buffy, because she was the best one for the role. She’s one of the main reasons the show was so successful. And by the way, she would never have become a real porn star - it’s just not part of her nature or personality - Keep in mind her personal band against being nude on film.Thursday 20 April 2006, by Anonymous : Hee! Everyone takes everything so seriously over here! I’m so amused by the first comment... but yeah, outside of Buffy I do believe SMG has no real acting talent, and her unwillingness to give the series or Joss any credit for making her a star makes me glad that one day she’s going to wake up and realise she’s a total has-been with a total a**wipe for a husband :D *hugs*Sunday 23 April 2006, by SpecialK : Her talent can’t just magically disappear "outside of Buffy". That made absolutely no sense. That’s like saying "outside of snowboarding in California, this snowboarder has no snowboarding talent". The person obviously still has talent but he/she might experience conditions in other places which cause them to snowboard poorly. You can’t blame Sarah’s lack of great material on her as an actress. That’s just lame. When has she never not given BtVS or Joss any credit? What crack are you smoking? Have you never read an interview with her ever? She consistently says great things about the show and about Joss as a creator. Get your information correct and get a freakin’ grip. Honestly, some of you are so idiotic. Monday 24 April 2006, by Anonymous : *Ahem* what I meant to say, then, is that my love for the show allows me to overlook her acting ability- I don’t care how well or badly people act in the Jossverse, as long as I’m getting a fix. And ’Sarah’s lack of great material’? The Grudge and Harvard Man were primo movies! And finally, where the hell have you been? There is known animosity between Sarah and Joss, as interviews with many of the writers reveal. Sarah, apparently, believes that Buffy’s success was mainly due to her, and she feels Joss has not acknowledged this- so in a mature display of schoolyard retaliation she refuses to give the show total credit for her success. Honestly, without Buffy, SMG would be stuck in daytime tv and in made for tv movies like... that swiss family robinson thing... she wouldnt be given the opportunity to go for big roles in which to suck ass.Saturday 6 May 2006, by WTF? : "No real acting talent?" WTF? To the anonymous prats on 20th and 24th April - maybe you should piss off to another website??These comments are an anwser to this article : Sarah Michelle Gellar - "Southland Tales" Movie - Medium Quality Behind The Scenes Photos 1
|
Sitemap XML