|
Wednesday 2 June 2004, by Anonymous : I think Michelle is a naturally pretty girl — but this photographer did not do her natural beauty justice. He actually made a pretty girl look, not very pretty. Just overly made up and sort of cheesy. She looks like an Olsen twin — as Howard Stern says, "a little wh*re."Wednesday 2 June 2004, by J : I agree, bad make-up, it makes her look like she’s been crying or not getting any sleep or something.Wednesday 2 June 2004, by krapnek : She looks like Avril Lavigne in that last shot ;)Wednesday 2 June 2004, by Anonymous : nice to see shes well on her way to truly being one of the women of buffy ... all of which seem to have a problem keeping their clothes on for some reason.Wednesday 2 June 2004, by mitchieno1fansince4ever : Leave Mitchie alone, she’s very kool From Michelle no1 fan alysonlurvermitchiefan Wednesday 2 June 2004, by Robert : It’s a different look for her but I still think she looks goodWednesday 2 June 2004, by Anonymous : No, the eyeliner and the whole moodiness doesn’t work for herWednesday 2 June 2004, by ashlee : I don’t like at all these pics!Michelle looks like a junkie here despite the fact she is a really cute girl when she is natural.The heavy and dark make-up isn’t the best way to make appear her young beautyWednesday 2 June 2004, by keira : she looks vulgar and unhealthy in these pics.But maybe she wants to disfigure herself!Thursday 3 June 2004, by Anonymous : I like the second and fourth pictures, aside from that I agree. I still see her as Dawn in the beginning of season 5. Or as lil Harriet the Spy. I also agree with the extremity of Buffyverse girls wanting to get naked...Thursday 3 June 2004, by Bibi : That first picture feels like child porn to me. Urgh. Is that her nipple or am i seeing things?!? How quickly they grow up. Thursday 3 June 2004, by haha : she IS legal, folks, get over it.Friday 4 June 2004, by Faith Bowie : I think she looks great, but then she always does but I love the artistic touch to the photos, already using them in a layout. Since most of the people bitching about how she looks could probably never land a shoot like that, I say shut up and be happy for her.Friday 4 June 2004, by Anonymous : these picks are visually stimulating to say the least. Michelle tragically hot. Now if only we could get some screen caps from that Trapt video for "Echo"Friday 4 June 2004, by Anonymous : is it just me or dose it look like she’s crying in the last one? Maybe it’s just the way the lights hitting her. Good pics, deffinately different. But Michelle isn’t a little kid anymore. Just hope she dosen’t start takeing her cloths off like (as was pointed out) so many buffyverse wemon seem to do...Friday 4 June 2004, by nmcil : I think the 4th photograph is really very beautiful - She looks wonderful and just a little "Lolitaesque."Saturday 5 June 2004, by Anonymous : Sarah Michelle Gellar is one of the few Buffyverse women whose has not decided to strip down just for the hell of it. She is a very classy lady. Also, these photos are nowhere near the degrading level of nudie pics. Michelle will wear revealing clothes but (so far) hasn’t chosen to go that far. Saturday 5 June 2004, by Anonymous : Yuk Yuk Yuk........whats the point here? Artsy fartsy or child porno? She may be of age but she looks 12 and thats stretching it! Recheck your thinking people......Saturday 5 June 2004, by Anonymous : I’d hit it.Saturday 5 June 2004, by Anonymous : Sarah Michelle Gellar is one of the few Buffyverse women whose has not decided to strip down just for the hell of it. She is a very classy lady. Sarah has also done some pretty risque photo shoots. The FHM issue where she is holding the riding crop springs to mind... As for the pictures, I really like them. Especially the black and white ones. But I can understand why people are so uncomfortable with sexy Michelle—she’s lil’ Dawny in a lot of peoples’ eyes. It’s kinda like the Olsen twins. When you’ve watched them group up, seeing them with an even remotely womanly body makes a part of you feel like you’re looking at kiddie porn. Sunday 6 June 2004, by Greg : Is it me or do all these pics make her nose look really big? she looks ok tho.Sunday 6 June 2004, by Phizzy : "OMGOMGOMG CHILD PORN! :O" You people are retarded. You expect children to stay children forever? Keep thinking like that, you’ll see revealing pictures of her when shes like 40 or somethign and you’ll be like OMGOMGOMG CHILD PORN! :O again! YOU FOOLS! Sunday 6 June 2004, by Anonymous : OMG is right! and your the fool if you don’t think she looks like a twelve year old strung out druggy with her top falling off in these photos...at least Brittany has the maturity in her looks to back up her leap into adulthood...these photos are disturbing in my opinion and I personally don’t care for whats its projecting........SueMonday 7 June 2004, by Anonymous : u guys r so prudish. she has clothes on, nothing kinky goin on so how is this porn of any kind? i’m younger than MT and, well, she probably just want to show people that she really isnt that young or innocentThese comments are an anwser to this article : Michelle Trachtenberg - Flaunt Magazine #55 Photoshoot - Photos
|
Sitemap XML