|
Sunday 3 October 2004, by Anonymous : she looks like julia roberts in the 1st picture 3rd row downSunday 3 October 2004, by missing_u : hey i love this pics!!!!!!! they´re very cool!!!!!Sunday 3 October 2004, by Anonymous : Gellar really looks different in these pictures, so different that I wouldn’t have recognized her in some of them. Fake hair, wig or extensions, lotta makeup, but something else is different about her face. I wonder if she got the same cheekbone implants that Eliza Dushku did but they worked on her while they looked bad on ED. Cause that doesn’t really look like her. I’ll have to see more candids to decide. It might just be makeup and the photography and photomanipulation. Sunday 3 October 2004, by Spikerulz04 : She is just so incredibly gorgeous! Well done God!Sunday 3 October 2004, by ari : this is an awesome photoshoot. they sort of remind me of old horror movies. . just the feel of them. she`s gorgeous as ever. =)Monday 4 October 2004, by Anonymous : No she was never gorgeous. She used to be cute then she got to the point at the end of Buffy that she wasn’t even that. But in these pictures she does look gorgeous. Which leads me to think she DID have some work done. She used to have these chubby little cheeks that you just wanted to pinch, then she lost them and became emaciated. Now with these cheek implants she has cheeks again but with the rest of her face staying thin. It is a nice look for her. Though it doesn’t look like her. I wonder if she’ll be subject to the Jennifer Gray plastic surgery curse where an actress who no longer looks like herself can no longer get work even if she’s prettier AFTER the plastic surgery. Monday 4 October 2004, by Anonymous : I don’t think God had much to do with it.Monday 4 October 2004, by Anonymous : She has not had plastic surgery. The photographs have been airbrused and generally enhanced. All photographs of this type undergo that process and bear little actual relation to what the subject looks like in real life.Monday 4 October 2004, by Anonymous : cheek implants blah blah blah WHO CARES! she still looks hot!Monday 4 October 2004, by Baby_Angel : she is beautiful...gorgeous and young who cares if she did something to her face...????? you jealous people!!!Tuesday 5 October 2004, by Thurisaz : I love those images. Just when I thought my Sarah Michelle Gellar crush had faded, I take a gander at the Entertainment Weekly I got in the mail (which has a different cover than the one shown here), and it came back again. My favourite picture is the Suspiria nod. Tuesday 5 October 2004, by Anonymous : i dont care if she make something in her face! anyway she is a totally gorgeous great pretty goodness! i love her!!Tuesday 5 October 2004, by BadGirl-Faith : If you look at a previous Sarah Michelle Gellar picture from this year compared to these ones, there is a huge difference with the way she looks. especially her cheeks and her mouth. It way just be that the picture was altered... who knows.Wednesday 6 October 2004, by Joyce : She is maturing and women do look increasingly better as they move through their twenties and thirties. I concur that there are some very juvenile folks on this board to disparage Sarah’s loolks like that.Saturday 8 January 2005, by greg : I don’t know what the hell it is about the one that says ’when there’s no room left in hell, the dead will walk the earth,’ but it really moved me, granted in a really freaky way but it was just very touching. I probably have some sort of problem. oh well, she’s fab as always.These comments are an anwser to this article : Sarah Michelle Gellar - Entertainment Weekly Oct. 2004 - High Quality Scans
|
Sitemap XML